Litecoin founder Charlie Lee on Bancor security breach: An exchange is not decentralized if it can lose customer funds

Home » News » Litecoin founder Charlie Lee on Bancor security breach: An exchange is not decentralized if it can lose customer funds
July 10, 2018 by
Litecoin founder Charlie Lee on Bancor security breach: An exchange is not decentralized if it can lose customer funds

Decentralized cryptocurrency platform Bancor experienced a “protection breach” on July 9. The uploaded an official statement pertaining to the security breach which occurred at around 00:00 UTC.

Bancor discussed in the declaration that they are “committing every resource to solving it”. The details of the violation are still being explored. However, the things which are confirmed are, a pocketbook used to update some smart agreements was compromised. The budget was after that used to take out Ethereum token (ETH) worth $12.5 million from BNT smart agreement. The hack came as a shock not just to the users but additionally to everybody else in the crypto-verse. In fact, Litecoin founder, Charlie Lee even took a dig at the ‘decentralized’ budget.

” A Bancor pocketbook got hacked and that purse has the capability to swipe coins out of their very own clever agreements,” Lee tweeted. “An exchange is not decentralized if it could shed customer funds or if it could ice up client funds. Bancor can do BOTH. It’s an incorrect feeling of decentralization.”
A twitter individual commented on his blog post discussing the distinction in between the exchange as well as the bnt token. “Bancor does not hold your symbols so could as a result not freeze your funds. Bnt can be iced up as could many leading erc20 symbols. It’s even considered a safety and security ideal method by some.” The user claimed, “The coins that were stolen really did not come from individuals. Bancor obtained its own funds swiped. Same as if you ‘d have yours taken. Central to you. Also, the paradox of this is that centralisation is what actually saved $12 mil bnt from being swiped. It’s the eth that cannot be returned. [sic]

See likewise: Bancor Issues Protection Breach Caution: Remains Down for Upkeep

Another user stated exactly how his statement is wrong stating, “All ERC token designers could freeze their wise agreements or freeze a details budget if the sc made by doing this. Bancor is the makers of BNT token so they have full authority. [sic] The stolen Ethereum token (ETH) is from Bancor’s own budget, not users budget. “So both of your declarations are wrong,” the individual included.

Nonetheless, Bancor plans to be back online within 1 Day, CoinTelegraph reported. As well as, Bancor’s official statement discussed that after the theft was identified, they iced up the taken BNT. Nevertheless, Ethereum token (ETH) or other stolen token can not be frozen, so, they’re taking the aid of various other cryptocurrency exchanges to map the taken symbols and also make it tough for the cyberpunk to liquidate them. They have also assured saying that no individual pocketbooks have been jeopardized in the attack.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© Copyright 2018. Ourex. Designed by Space-Themes.com.